MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combined electrophoretic and immunological methods in the study of human amylases

2009· article· en· W2035870658 on OpenAlex
G. Skude

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmylaseSalivaBiologyElectrophoresisAntiserumChromatographyBiochemistryAgarose gel electrophoresisMolecular biologyImmunofixationAntibodyEnzymeChemistryImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyMonoclonal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rabbit anti-human amylase was obtained after immunization with amylase prepared by gel filtration of parotid saliva. The antiserum also precipitated human pancreatic amylase. With antigen-antibody crossed electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis, the amylase of saliva separated into five isoenzymes after prolonged electrophoresis in agarose using barbital buffer. In pancreatic secretion, four amylase fractions were identified. In urine, amylases from both sources were recognized. An enzymatic staining procedure that was developed using the starch-iodine reaction gave identical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it