Suitability of <i>Glomus intraradices</i> in vitro produced spores and root segment inoculum for the establishment of a mycorrhizosphere in an experimental microcosm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various experimental systems have been developed to study the mycorrhizosphere. In this study, a microcosm experimental system was constructed and optimized to simulate the environments of the mycorrhizosphere: the rhizosphere, the mycosphere, and the bulk soil, using beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as host plants. We investigated, in a time-course study, the effect of axenically in vitro produced spore inoculum and root segment inoculum of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith, on extraradical mycelium development, rapidity of mycorrhizal colonization, and plant growth under nonsterile soil conditions. Three concentrations of in vitro produced spores and three concentrations of root segment inoculum produced from open pot cultures were used. The two highest concentrations of spores used as inoculum resulted in faster and more abundant colonization than when root segments were used. A significant correlation was obtained between hyphal densities present in the rhizosphere and mycosphere compartments, and the amount of spore inoculum used. The densities of roots in the rhizosphere compartment and hyphae in the rhizosphere and mycosphere compartments were comparable with field-grown plants; thus, the system realistically mimics a natural mycorrhizosphere. The use of the microcosm described in this study, in combination with the in vitro produced spore inoculum of G. intraradices, represents an experimental approach well adapted for studying the microbial ecology of the mycorrhizosphere.Key words: AMF, microbial ecology, inoculum, mycorrhiza, mycorrhizosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".