MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035894846 · doi:10.2217/fnl.10.36

Refractory insular cortex epilepsy: clinical features, investigation and treatment

2010· article· en· W2035894846 on OpenAlexaff
Werner Surbeck, Alain Bouthillier, Dang Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsular cortexEpilepsyRefractory (planetary science)InsulaNeuroscienceTemporal lobeEpilepsy surgeryCortex (anatomy)MedicinePsychologyAnesthesiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significant percentage of patients continue to present with seizures after epilepsy surgery. Among the multiple causes, the most obvious ones include failure to remove all of the epileptogenic tissue or incorrect localization of the epileptogenic zone. Recent evidence has shown that failure to recognize insular cortex seizures may be responsible for some of these surgical failures. First, insular seizures may mimic temporal, parietal or frontal lobe seizures. Second, insular seizures may coexist with seizures from other lobes. In this article, we review recently published data on the role of the insula in refractory partial epilepsy, the appropriate investigation and surgical therapy for this seizure entity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207