Synthetic Approaches to the Microtubule-Stabilizing Sponge Alkaloid Ceratamine A and Desbromo Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two synthetic approaches to the microtubule-stabilizing ceratamine alkaloids are described. The first approach involved attempts to graft an aminoimidazole moiety onto an azepine ring to form partially hydrogenated versions of the unprecedented aromatic imidazo[4,5-d]azepine core of the ceratamines. This route ultimately failed because it was not possible to aromatize the partially hydrogenated ceratamine intermediates. A second approach started with tribromoimidazole that was sequentially metalated and functionalized to efficiently generate a key imidazole intermediate containing vinyl bromide and amide functionalities. An intramolecular Buchwald vinyl amidation reaction converted this key intermediate into a bicyclic imidazo[4,5-d]azepine that was at the same oxidation state as the aromatic core of the ceratamines. The 2-amino functionality present on the imidazole ring of the ceratamines was installed using a Buchwald/Hartwig amination reaction on a 2-chloroimidazole precursor. Deprotection and aromatization resulted in the first synthesis of desbromoceratamine A (55) and desmethyldesbromoceratamine A (60). An unanticipated addition of atmospheric oxygen was encountered during deprotection of the imidazole ring in the last step of the synthesis leading to C-11 oxygenated ceratamine analogues as byproducts. Evaluation of the synthetic ceratamines in a TG3 cell-based assay for mitotic arrest revealed that the C-14 and C-16 bromine substituents in ceratamine A (1) play a major role in the antimitotic potency of the natural product. The synthetic route to ceratamine analogues has provided sufficient quantities of desbromoceratamine A (55) for testing in mouse models of cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".