The Effect of Cash Flow on Share Price of the Jordanian Commercial Banks Listed in Amman Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims at examining the effect of cash flow on share price of the Jordanian commercial banks listed in Amman stock exchange, through measuring the effect of operational, investing and financing cash flow, as individual or jointly on the share price of the Jordanian commercial banks. In order to achieve the objectives of the study a sample of twelve Jordanian commercial banks were chosen through intentional sampling approach, out of fifteen banks which constitutes the total number of the Jordanian commercial banks. These participating banks meet the requirement of the study.For the sake of the study, the analytical approach along with other necessary statistical methods have been utilized. Annual reports to obtain financial statements for the purpose of statements analysis are used too. Statistical analysis indicates several results such as: There is limited effect of operative, investment and financing cash flows on share market value of the Jordanian commercial banks (study’s sample responses on items 10, 20,132). Consequently, more concern is needed in regard to cash flow behavior when conducting share price assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".