MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035966164 · doi:10.1115/gt2002-30283

Remote Diagnostics of the Alliance Gas Pipeline System Architecture and Initial Operating Experience

2002· article· en· W2035966164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gianni Mochi, Erio Benvenuti, Roberto Baldocci, David Bianucci

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOriginal equipment manufacturerPipeline (software)Compressor stationPipeline transportNatural gasArchitectureEngineeringComputer scienceSystems engineeringCondition monitoringOperating systemElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alliance Pipeline Limited (APL) pipeline is a 1850 miles transmission line delivering natural gas from British Columbia (Canada) to Chicago (Illinois USA). The Pipeline crosses remote areas and is subject to adverse winter weather conditions that may temporarily limit accessibility to sites where boosting stations are located. By considering APL requirements in terms of turbo compressor maintenance and operation level, a system providing real time and historical monitoring capabilities was designed to support pipeline operation with the newest available analysis techniques. Thanks to current communication technologies the system allows for a stable link between equipment and OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer - GE Oil&Gas - O&G) that is operating the system since pipeline commissioning in November 2000. This paper describes the system architecture and processes to deliver advanced condition monitoring and proactive maintenance planning for the APL turbo compressing fleet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207