MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036001634 · doi:10.1080/01496390701512034

Pure and Binary Adsorption Equilibria of Methane and Carbon Dioxide on Silicalite

2007· article· en· W2036001634 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAdsorptionMethaneThermodynamicsBinary numberCarbon dioxideBinary systemConsistency (knowledge bases)Physical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For the separation of CH4 and CO2 from landfill gas, pure and binary adsorption behavior of these gases were studied up to 5 atmosphere pressure at 40, 70, and 100°C for silicalite as the adsorbent. Pure and binary adsorption isotherms were determined experimentally and compared to predicted isotherms by several equilibrium models, as well as the other available data in the literature. Experimental binary isotherms at different concentrations were determined by using three concentration pulse methods (CPM). HT–CPM (Harlick‐Tezel CPM) was observed to be the best one to describe the behavior of this binary system. Equilibrium phase diagrams and separation factors were obtained from the experimental binary isotherms. For this system, the integral thermodynamic consistency tests were also shown and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it