MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036025369 · doi:10.3917/geoec.054.0091

Football et médias : un heureux mariage de raison

2010· article· fr· W2036025369 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Riolo

Bibliographic record

VenueGéoéconomie/Géoéconomie · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleHumanitiesFootballArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’analyse des rapports entre les médias et le football fait clairement apparaître une entente tacite, un mariage de raison. La télévision, comme l’avait prédit Ernest Chamond en 1927, a transformé le match de foot en un spectacle sans équivalent en termes d’audience. Véritable financier du football, la télévision est avant tout un partenaire de « business ». Face à ce couple heureux, les journalistes cherchent leur place. S’ils sont promoteurs de spectacle à la Football et médias : un heureux mariage de raison télévision, ils donnent l’impression d’une plus grande indépendance en presse écrite ou en radio. Reste que l’émotion prédomine le plus souvent sur la réflexion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.228
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéoéconomie/GéoéconomieSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207