MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036092359 · doi:10.1556/sscmath.40.2003.4.1

Sturm--Liouville theory for the p-Laplacian

2003· article· en· W2036092359 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Binding, Pavel Drábek

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEigenfunctionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSturm–Liouville theoryLaplace operatorTransformation (genetics)Oscillation (cell signaling)p-LaplacianOscillation theoryType (biology)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsMathematical physicsPartial differential equationBoundary value problemPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A version of Sturm--Liouville theory is given for the one-dimensional p-Laplacian including the radial case. The treatment is modern but follows the strategy of Elbert's early work. Topics include a Prüfer-type transformation, eigenvalue existence, asymptotics and variational principles, and eigenfunction oscillation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Scientiarum Mathematicarum HungaricaSame topicSpectral Theory in Mathematical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207