MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2036096985 · doi:10.1118/1.2240127

SU‐CC‐ValA‐09: Radiation Quality in High Contrast Imaging with Orthogonal Bremsstrahlung Beams

2006· article· en· W2036096985 on OpenAlexaff
Arman Sarfehnia, Keyvan Jabbari, Jan Seuntjens, E. B. Podgoršak

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBremsstrahlungPhysicsPhotonElectronOpticsRadiationAttenuationAtomic numberLinear particle acceleratorPhoton energyCathode rayBeam (structure)Atomic physicsMaterials scienceNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To study the characteristics of orthogonal bremsstrahlung photons produced by megavoltage electron pencil beams and to evaluate the suitability of their use for improved radiation therapy imaging. Method and Materials: A 10 MeV electron beam emerging through the research port of a Varian Clinac‐18 linac was made to strike targets of carbon, aluminum and copper. The quality of resulting forward and orthogonal bremsstrahlung beams was evaluated using PDD and attenuation measurements, and the experimental findings were compared with Monte Carlo‐calculated results using the EGSnrcMP code. Images of contrast objects were acquired with Agfa 400 diagnostic films and their contrast levels were analyzed. Results: Photon yield and mean energy of the forward bremsstrahlung spectra were determined to be essentially independent of the target's atomic number Z. In comparison with forward bremsstrahlung, the yield and effective energy were lower in the orthogonal direction, and this decrease was more pronounced for targets of lower atomic number. The effective energy of a spectrum produced by carbon dropped by a factor of 10 from 1535 keV in the forward direction to 151 keV in the orthogonal direction, while for aluminum it dropped by 77% to 425 keV, and for copper by 37% to 1107 keV. The image contrast of films exposed with orthogonal beams was qualitatively determined to be superior to that obtained using the forward megavoltage beams. Conclusions: Orthogonal bremsstrahlung beams produced by megavoltage electrons have a significantly lower mean energy compared to forward beams. In the orthogonal direction, higher Z targets create higher intensity, while lower Z targets provide a more desirable low energy spectrum. Using their relatively low effective energy, orthogonal bremsstrahlung beams produced by megavoltage electrons striking low atomic number targets yield images with a higher contrast than do forward bremsstrahlung beams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→