Geostationary magnetic field response to solar wind pressure variations: Time delay and local time variation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between solar wind dynamic pressure changes and geosynchronous magnetic field response is studied using 15 years of OMNI2 and GOES data at 1‐minute resolution. Significant magnetospheric response to solar wind‐forcing is found to be most frequent near noon (30% of all intervals), and virtually absent on the night‐side. The strongest response occurs when IMF Bz is strongly northward and the effect of reducing IMF Bz is most pronounced in the dusk sector. Approximately 25% of dayside Bz variance for related intervals can be attributed to direct response from solar wind dynamic pressure forcing. Time lag between changes in the solar wind at the bow shock nose and similar fluctuations in the magnetosphere at geosynchronous orbit (6.6 Re) is typically 2 to 4 minutes, with responses occurring first in the post‐noon sector and approximately 2 minutes later near dawn. The OMNI2 HRO time‐shifting algorithm appears to be quite effective, with a slight (2 minute) systematic increase in lag and no increased scatter for the most distant upstream solar wind satellite location.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".