Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Complications Associated with Cyclooxygenase‐2 Selective and Nonselective Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications associated with use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective (celecoxib and rofecoxib) and individual nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compared with nonuse of these drugs. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. DATA SOURCE: Administrative health care databases of Saskatchewan, Canada. PATIENTS: Among a population of men and women aged 20-89 years who were covered by public health insurance with prescription drug benefits between November 15, 1999, and December 31, 2001, 726 case patients with first hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal complications (with validation of cases through review of hospital medical records) were confirmed from 1,054,532 person-years of follow-up, and 20,002 control patients were randomly selected from all eligible controls, frequency matched to cases on their index date (+/- 3 mo). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between upper gastrointestinal complications and use of NSAIDs. Current rofecoxib and naproxen users had the highest risk for upper gastrointestinal complications with adjusted ORs of 3.6 (95% CI 2.2-5.7) and 3.4 (95% CI 1.8-6.7), respectively. No association was found between the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications and use of celecoxib (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.8) or the use of diclofenac plus misoprostol (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.8). A dose-response relationship was observed for rofecoxib and naproxen with ORs for high dose of 5.2 (95% CI 2.5-10.6) and 5.1 (95% CI 2.1-12.3), respectively. Short-term users of celecoxib and naproxen had a higher risk than long-term users, whereas among users of rofecoxib the risk was higher among long-term than short-term users. CONCLUSION: These findings support the variability of individual NSAIDs in the elevated risk of upper gastrointestinal complications. Our results suggest that the risk for rofecoxib is similar to that for naproxen. Celecoxib users appear to have a similar risk for upper gastrointestinal complications as nonusers; however, the risk may be increased at the start of treatment with celecoxib.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".