MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036303651 · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2399

Effects of nonstructural carbohydrate concentration in alfalfa on fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in continuous culture

2010· article· en· W2036303651 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. Berthiaume, C. Benchaar, Alex V. Chaves, Gaëtan F. Tremblay, Yves Castonguay, Annick Bertrand, Gilles Bélanger, R. Michaud, C. Lafrenière, Tim A. McAllister, A.F. Brito

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenForageFermentationBiologyStarchFodderIncubationAnimal scienceDry matterSucroseCarbohydrateAgronomyChemistryFood scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insufficient readily fermentable energy combined with extensive degradation of proteins in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) may result in poor forage N utilization by ruminants. Using the inherent genetic variability and differences between harvests, our objective was to compare the effect of contrasting concentrations of nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) in alfalfa on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis. Individual genotypes of the alfalfa cultivar AC Caribou grown near Québec City, Québec, Canada, were harvested at the vegetative and early flowering stages, dried at 55 degrees C, ground, and analyzed for soluble carbohydrates (fructose + sucrose + glucose + pinitol) and starch. Approximately 20 genotypes having, respectively, the highest and lowest NSC concentrations were pooled to constitute 2 contrasted 1-kg forage samples. Samples of high- (17.9% DM) and low- (7.4% DM) NSC alfalfa were respectively allocated to separate dual-flow fermenters in a completely randomized design with 3 replications. Rumen inoculum was obtained from 4 ruminally fistulated cows in early lactation that were fed a TMR with a 50:50 forage to concentrate ratio. A 10-d incubation period was used, with the first 6 d serving as an adaptation period followed by 4 d of sampling with solid and liquid dilution rates in the fermenters set at approximately 2.0 and 4.3%/h, respectively. High versus low NSC concentration in alfalfa significantly enhanced the apparent digestibility of OM (59.1% for high-NSC alfalfa vs. 54.4% for low-NSC alfalfa) and DM (60.0 vs. 54.3%) and the true digestibility of DM (74.1 vs. 64.7%). Increasing NSC concentration in alfalfa (high vs. low) significantly decreased ruminal pH (6.85 vs. 7.08) and NH(3)-N concentration (26.0 vs. 33.6 mg/dL) and increased total VFA concentration (94.9 vs. 83.0mM). Molar proportions of acetate, isobutyrate, and isovalerate significantly decreased, whereas molar proportions of propionate and butyrate significantly increased with high-NSC alfalfa, resulting in a more glucogenic fermentation. More importantly, microbial N flow (263 vs. 230 mg/d) and bacterial N efficiency (41.1 vs. 29.6% of available N), measured using (15)N as a microbial marker, both significantly increased with the high-NSC alfalfa. These results indicate that increasing the concentration of NSC in alfalfa promotes a glucogenic fermentation and enhances microbial N synthesis in the rumen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207