Dynamic file bundling for large-scale content distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One highly-scalable approach to content delivery is to harness the upload bandwidth of the clients. Peer-assisted content delivery systems have been shown to effectively offload the servers of popular files, as the request rates of popular content enable the formation of self-sustaining torrents, where the entire content of the file is available among the peers themselves. However, for less popular files, these systems are less helpful in offloading servers. With a long tail of mildly popular content, with a high aggregate demand, a large fraction of the file requests must still be handled by servers. In this paper, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a dynamic file bundling system, where peers are requested to download content which they may not otherwise download in order to “inflate” the popularity of less popular files. Our system introduces the idea of a super bundle, which consists of a large catalogue of files. From this catalogue, smaller bundles, consisting of a small set of files, can dynamically be assigned to individual users. The system can dynamically adjust the number of downloaders of each file and thus enables the popularity inflation to be optimized according to current file popularities and the desired tradeoff between download times and server resource usage. The system is evaluated on PlanetLab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".