MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036318518 · doi:10.7202/018450ar

Action syndicale, démocratie et santé mentale au travail1

2008· article· fr· W2036318518 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacques Rhéaume, Marie-France Maranda, Jean-Simon Deslauriers, Louise St-Arnaud, Louis Trudel

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La problématique de la santé mentale au travail est très présente dans les milieux syndicaux, replaçant au coeur de l’action syndicale l’importance de la qualité de vie au travail. Plusieurs recherches participatives, inspirées de la psychodynamique de travail et des récits de pratiques ont permis d’explorer le vécu et la réflexion de militants syndicaux sur la santé mentale au travail, tant dans leur travail à l’intérieur des structures syndicales que dans leurs interventions dans divers milieux de travail. Les nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail, marquées par l’idéologie néoproductiviste portent atteinte à la santé mentale de nombre de travailleurs et travailleuses, y compris chez les représentants et militants syndicaux. La difficile démocratisation au travail constitue un risque important pour la santé mentale au travail, un signe peut‑être de la toujours présente aliénation au travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207