MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurements of hyperpolarized gas properties in the lung. part III:3HeT1

2001· article· en· W2036339853 on OpenAlexaff
Harald E. M�ller, Laurence W. Hedlund, X. Josette Chen, Michael R. Carey, Mark S. Chawla, Charles T. Wheeler, G. Allan Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsNuclear magnetic resonanceLungChemistryMaterials scienceMedicinePhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperpolarized (3)He spin-lattice relaxation was investigated in the guinea pig lung using spectroscopy and imaging techniques with a repetitive RF pulse series. T(1) was dominated by interactions with oxygen and was used to measure the alveolar O(2) partial pressure. In animals ventilated with a mixture of 79% (3)He and 21% O(2), T(1) dropped from 19.6 sec in vivo to 14.6 sec after cardiac arrest, reflecting the termination of the intrapulmonary gas exchange. The initial difference in oxygen concentration between inspired and alveolar air, and the temporal decay during apnea were related to functional parameters. Estimates of oxygen uptake were 29 +/- 11 mL min(-1) kg(-1) under normoxic conditions, and 9.0 +/- 2.0 mL min(-1) kg(-1) under hypoxic conditions. Cardiac output was estimated to be 400 +/- 160 mL min(-1) kg(-1). The functional residual capacity derived from spirometric magnetic resonance experiments varied with body mass between 5.4 +/- 0.3 mL and 10.7 +/- 1.1 mL. Magn Reson Med 45:421-430, 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207