Novel Gb3 Isoforms Detected in Urine of Fabry Disease Patients: A Metabolomic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fabry disease is characterized by the accumulation of globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb(3)) and globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in biological fluids and tissues. Metabolomic studies recently undertaken by our group, showed the presence of novel plasma and urine lyso-Gb(3)-related analogs in male and female Fabry patients. These analogs are distinguished by differences in structure of the sphingosine moiety. The principal aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of detecting other Fabry disease biomarkers structurally related to Gb(3). A time-of-flight mass spectrometry metabolomic approach, focusing on mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios from 1000 to 1200 Da, was devised. This m/z window corresponds to the isoforms and potential analogs of Gb(3). Five different categories of Gb(3)- related isoforms/analogs were detected: Gb(3)-related isoforms with saturated fatty acids, methylated Gb(3)-related isoforms, Gb(3)-related isoforms/analogs with one double bond, Gb(3) analogs with hydrated sphingosine, and Gb(3)-related isoforms/analogs with two double bonds. A secondary objective was to elucidate the relationship between Gb(3) and lyso-Gb(3). The methylation observed on Gb(3)-related analogs was not detected on lyso-Gb(3). We speculate that the methylated Gb(3) may be an intermediate compound in the deacylation of Gb(3) to generate the lyso-Gb(3) molecule. We are in the process of devising a quantification methodology for these methylated Gb(3)-related analogs in Fabry patients to try to understand the underlying biochemical mechanisms involved in this complex disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".