MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036370458 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0160

The Blue Banner: The Presbyterian Church of Saint David and Presbyterian Witness in Halifax (review)

2009· article· en· W2036370458 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Denis McKim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTBannerWitnessHistoryReminiscenceScholarshipNewspaperArt historyQueen (butterfly)ArtTheologyLawMedia studiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Blue Banner: The Presbyterian Church of Saint David and Presbyterian Witness in Halifax Denis McKim The Blue Banner: The Presbyterian Church of Saint David and Presbyterian Witness in Halifax. Barry Cahill, Laurence Dewolfe, Murray Alary, Elizabeth A. Chard, and Lois Yorke. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008. Pp. 352. $39.95 The Blue Banner is a superb study of Halifax's Presbyterian Church of Saint David. It illuminates the church's history and inner workings and chronicles in exquisite detail its contribution to the survival of Presbyterianism in one of Canada's principal urban centres. The book is the product of a collaborative labour of love. Each of its five authors – Barry Cahill, Laurence DeWolfe, Murray Alary, Elizabeth A. Chard, and Lois Yorke – has been involved in some capacity in the congregation's affairs. Their emotional attachment to Saint David's is [End Page 172] palpable and is reflected in the sympathetic manner in which they unravel its elaborate eighty-three-year history. Yet their fondness for Saint David's is by no means incompatible with substantive scholarship. On the contrary, The Blue Banner is characterized throughout by painstaking research and incisive investigation. Based on church documents, contemporary newspaper accounts, and personal reminiscences, The Blue Banner offers an exhaustive exploration of the anatomy of Saint David's. The book consists of three parts – a succinct sketch of the turbulent circumstances that precipitated the church's formation; thumbnail biographies of each of the five ministers who have presided over the congregation of Saint David's since its inception; and an examination of myriad aspects of congregational life, including vivid depictions of the church's musical tradition and vigorous involvement in social outreach programs. The authors' main contention is that the survival of Presbyterianism in Halifax following the establishment of the United Church of Canada in June 1925 is largely the result of an abiding commitment on the part of the congregation of Saint David's to doctrinal integrity and the principle of religious pluralism. With the founding of the United Church – which absorbed Canada's Methodists and Congregationalists, as well as two-thirds of its Presbyterians – Halifax's Presbyterian congregations ceased to exist. A majority within each of the city's nine Presbyterian churches voted in favour of church union. Thus, at a stroke, what was then Canada's largest Protestant denomination vanished from metropolitan Halifax. Yet Halifax's Presbyterians proved a resilient bunch. The staunchest anti-unionists – or 'continuing Presbyterians' – rallied around a deep-seated aversion to the union scheme. They objected to what they perceived as the United Church's doctrinal laxity and institutional homogeneity, both of which were viewed as threats to Presbyterian uniqueness. Seeking to safeguard the denomination's characteristic tenets and traditions, opponents of church union established a new Presbyterian congregation, Saint David's, which found a home for itself in the winter of 1925 in a vacant Methodist church located on the southwest corner of Grafton and Blowers Streets. Owing to the sophistication of its institutions, the dedication of its members, and the stewardship of its ministers and staff, Saint David's would go on to distinguish itself as a bulwark of Atlantic-Canadian Presbyterianism. The most impressive aspect of this book is its impassioned defence of the continuing Presbyterians' resistance to church union. The authors are at pains to emphasize that the defiant anti-unionists were guided by neither petty sectarianism nor an irrational Scots [End Page 173] Presbyterian ethnocentrism. Rather, they were spurred on by a desire to defend doctrinal orthodoxy and institutional independence. The continuing Presbyterians, they explain, 'were not fighting for a church – much less a Scottish-Canadian church – but for the church, the spiritual body of Christ' (44). What appeared to many non Presbyterians to be an expression of stubborn anti-ecumenism, then, was in fact a principled opposition to the unionists' supposed disregard for evangelical preaching, and the fact that distinctive denominational traditions were likely to be swamped within a monolithic multi-denominational church. The authors attribute the unionists' perceived lack of concern for doctrinal orthodoxy to an overriding preoccupation with the social gospel movement, which crested during the lead-up to church...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207