Previous Experience and Reproductive Investment of Female Columbian Ground Squirrels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reproductive success of females in iteroparous species usually increases early in life, then remains constant or declines. The restraint hypothesis suggests that primiparous females limit their 1st reproduction in order to avoid future costs to survival, reproduction, or both, whereas constraint indicates that primiparous females are limited in their 1st reproductive attempt either because they lack sufficient resources (measured by body mass) or lack experience at weaning a litter. To evaluate these alternatives, we examined age- and experience-related patterns of reproduction in female Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus) with data from a long-term study and by experimentally altering age at 1st reproduction. In the results of the long-term study, experienced females had significantly higher reproductive investment and reproductive success (number of offspring surviving to yearling age) compared to inexperienced females. Annual survival of females was not affected by their level of previous weaning experience or current reproductive investment. Additionally, subsequent reproductive success was not impaired by earlier reproduction. In the experimental results, experienced females had significantly higher reproductive investments compared to inexperienced females. Constraint in terms of previous weaning experience best explained the differences in reproductive investment and reproductive success between primiparous and multiparous females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".