Prenatal diagnosis of Smith‐Lemli‐Opitz syndrome (SLOS) by <i>DHCR7</i> mutation analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We review our experience using mutation analysis of the DHCR7 gene for prenatal diagnosis of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS), an autosomal recessive disorder of endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis caused by deficiency of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7). METHODS AND RESULTS: Prenatal diagnosis of SLOS was conducted for 21 pregnancies involving 15 families. DNA was isolated directly from amniotic fluid cells or chorionic villus samples (CVS), and the DHCR7 gene was screened for the parental mutations using PCR-ARMS and nucleotide sequencing. Sixteen of the pregnancies were unaffected and five were affected. There have been no incidences of misdiagnosed pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: DHCR7 mutation is a rapid and reliable method for prenatal diagnosis of SLOS, and provides an alternative to specialized biochemical tests for elevated 7DHC in amniotic fluid or CVS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".