MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036385857 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386270

Voltage Regulation of Wind Farms Equipped with Variable-Speed Doubly-Fed Induction Generators Wind Turbines

2007· article· en· W2036385857 on OpenAlexaff
Tarek H. M. EL-Fouly, Ehab F. El‐Saadany, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction generatorControl theory (sociology)Wind powerGridVoltageDoubly fed electric machineRotor (electric)Terminal (telecommunication)AC powerPower (physics)Wind speedBlock diagramEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Electrical engineeringMathematicsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new technique for regulating grid-connected wind farms terminal voltage. The wind farm under investigation is assumed equipped with doubly-fed induction generators (DFIGs). The proposed technique is based on using the grid-side converter to regulate the farm's terminal voltage rather than using the rotor-side converter to achieve this task. Description for the studied system with the used dynamic modeling equations and detailed illustrations for the control loops block diagrams are presented. Simulation results for different operating conditions are also presented to reveal the accuracy of the proposed technique. Finally, Corresponding simulation results under unity power factor operation conditions are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207