MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036386017 · doi:10.1115/1.1445327

Structural Monitoring with Fiber Optic Technology

2002· article· en· W2036386017 on OpenAlexaff
RM Measures, Serge Abrate

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics Reviews · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical fiberFiber optic sensorMaterials scienceStructural health monitoringFiberOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Need for Integrated Structural Monitoring Introduction to Lightwaves Light Sources and Detectors Fiber Optic Technology Fiber Optic Structural Sensors and Their Merits Fiber Optic Strain and Temperature Sensitivity Sensor Installation and Material Integration Issues Short Gauge Sensor and Applications Long Gauge-Length Fiber Optic Sensing Multiplexed Fiber Optic Structural Sensing Distributed Strain and Temperature Sensing Future Prospects and Summary References Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations368
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics ReviewsSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207