MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036412491 · doi:10.1177/0142331209345153

On the application of fuzzy predictive control based on multiple models strategy to a tubular heat exchanger system

2010· article· en· W2036412491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlHeat exchangerControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy control systemRealization (probability)Control systemFuzzy logicFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceControl engineeringRange (aeronautics)EngineeringControl (management)Mechanical engineeringMechanicsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the paper presented here is to control the fluid temperature that flows in the inner tube of a tubular heat exchanger system by means of the fluid flow pressure. This system in its present form has a specified range of the coefficients’ variation, while the temperature of the outlet fluid could generally be controlled by either the temperature or the flow of the inlet fluid flowing in the shell tube. The control realization for the system presented is often complicated, because the variation of the system coefficients and the reference signal must be thoroughly covered by the control action. In such a case, the system behaviour must first be represented by the multiple explicit models and then the appropriate control approach needs to be realized based on new techniques. A novel multiple models control strategy using both fuzzy-based predictive control (FPC) and overall fuzzy-based predictive model (OFPM) has been proposed in this paper. Concerning the strategy, the system must be modelled through the multiple OFPMs, while the corresponding FPCs need to be designed based on the model results. Hereinafter, the best OFPM of the system is accurately identified by an intelligent decision mechanism (IDM), as long as the system coefficients are abruptly varied, at each instant of time. Subsequently, the best FPC is chosen by the IDM and therefore its control action is applied to the system. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, simulations are carried out and the corresponding results are compared with those obtained using the well-known single model linear generalized predictive controller (SMLGPC), where the observer polynomial so-called T- polynomial is used to cope with the better disturbance rejection properties. By analysing the proposed control strategy performance in comparison with the SMLGPC, when the system coefficients and the desired set point are abruptly changed, it is easily observed that the new acquired performance is as good as the SMLGPC, where it is well known as a powerful control approach in the linear model-based predictive control family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it