MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036455237 · doi:10.1080/02673030500213953

From Housing to Home: Reflexive Management for those Deemed Hard to House

2005· article· en· W2036455237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHousing Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsVancouver Native Health SocietyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingDignityReflexivityPublic administrationEvictionPublic housingSociologyPopulationPublic relationsNarrativePolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomicsSocial scienceLawPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through an investigation of the Portland Hotel Services Society (PHS) in Vancouver, British Columbia, and in particular, their ‘no-eviction policy’, this paper examines the effect of social housing policies on residents, analyzes the part played by cultural narrative or scripts and concludes with a discussion on the need for reframing critical social issues. The nuances of this policy and its effects on the residents' lived experiences afford a greater understanding of how a housing provider such as PHS reframes their mandate to allow their residents to live in dignity. The exploratory research questions governing this study investigates:‘Who are the hard to house and how can their needs be met?’ and ‘What role do housing management policies perform and how can these policies reflect this population's needs?’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it