MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contralateral suppression of DPOAE measured in real time

2002· article· en· W2036457039 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian L. James, R. J. Mount, Robert V. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Otolaryngology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsAudiologyStimulus (psychology)Otoacoustic emissionMedicineHearing lossPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to measure contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in real time. A total of 10 human subjects were studied with a novel device to record DPOAE without signal time averaging, using digital narrow band pass filtering. Real time DPOAE levels were recorded at 2f1-f2 using primary tone settings of f2/f1 = 1.22 and L1 = 70 dB SPL, L2 = 65 dB SPL, at five values of f2 between 2.2 and 7.7 kHz. An acoustic stimulus was applied intermittently to the contralateral ear to cause DPOAE suppression. Characteristic features of contralateral suppression were identified and distinguished from small spontaneous variations in the real time DPOAE signal. Magnitude of suppression increased with contralateral stimulus intensity. Onset latency of suppression was around 43 ms (31-95 ms). Potential clinical applications are discussed in the light of these findings, including a role in improving the specificity of neonatal hearing screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical OtolaryngologySame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207