A novel oral dosage formulation of the ginsenoside aglycone protopanaxadiol exhibits therapeutic activity against a hormone-insensitive model of prostate cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on determining the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and efficacy of the ginsenoside aglycone protopanaxadiol (aPPD) administered as a single agent in a novel oral dosage formulation. To obtain these data and to characterize the stability of aPPD, appropriate analytical assay development was carried out. The solubility and stability of aPPD were determined, and the compound was formulated for oral gavage. aPPD levels in blood and tissues following oral administration to nu/nu nude mice were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. The efficacy of aPPD was determined upon oral administration to nu/nu nude mice bearing PC-3 human prostate cancer xenograft tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissues was performed to establish apoptotic indices and Ki-67 expression as markers of proliferation. The maximum solubility of aPPD in ethanol was 68.4 mg/ml. aPPD administered at a dose of 70 mg/kg yielded a T(max) of approximately 40 min and a C(max) value of 3.9 ± 1.4 μg/ml, and no toxicity was observed. aPPD accumulated largely in the stomach and small intestine and was also present in the brain. This dose engendered a significant delay in PC-3 tumor growth, an increase in apoptotic index, and a decrease in Ki-67 levels. We have shown that aPPD is a stable compound that can be formulated for oral gavage. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate the ability of this compound to be absorbed after oral administration. Future studies will assess the activity and pharmacokinetics of aPPD when administered in combination with standard chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it