MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036471411 · doi:10.3917/pcp.012.0231

Entre une psychanalyse raisonnable et une psychanalyse raisonnée : la subjectivité psychologique dans la psychanalyse américaine actuelle1

2006· article· fr· W2036471411 on OpenAlex
Hélène Tessier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychologie clinique et projective · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre une psychanalyse raisonnable et une psychanalyse raisonnée : la subjectivité psychologique dans la psychanalyse américaine actuelle. Cet article décrit l’attention que la psychanalyse américaine contemporaine accorde aux états de conscience et le désintérêt qu’elle manifeste pour l’inconscient sexuel. Il retrace les influences qui ont marqué la psychanalyse dans ses premières années d’implantation aux États-Unis et leur impact sur les courants actuels, qui s’incarne à la fois dans les orientations relationnelles et dans l’usage de plus en plus répandu des approches neuroscientifiques et des théories de l’attachement. Il souligne en quoi la contestation de la théorie classique de la sexualité, fondée sur des préoccupations légitimes, a cependant conduit la psychanalyse américaine à simplifier son objet d’étude et à renforcer ses tendances adaptatives..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it