Entre une psychanalyse raisonnable et une psychanalyse raisonnée : la subjectivité psychologique dans la psychanalyse américaine actuelle1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre une psychanalyse raisonnable et une psychanalyse raisonnée : la subjectivité psychologique dans la psychanalyse américaine actuelle. Cet article décrit l’attention que la psychanalyse américaine contemporaine accorde aux états de conscience et le désintérêt qu’elle manifeste pour l’inconscient sexuel. Il retrace les influences qui ont marqué la psychanalyse dans ses premières années d’implantation aux États-Unis et leur impact sur les courants actuels, qui s’incarne à la fois dans les orientations relationnelles et dans l’usage de plus en plus répandu des approches neuroscientifiques et des théories de l’attachement. Il souligne en quoi la contestation de la théorie classique de la sexualité, fondée sur des préoccupations légitimes, a cependant conduit la psychanalyse américaine à simplifier son objet d’étude et à renforcer ses tendances adaptatives..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".