MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036488918 · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318258f5aa

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Curriculum to Teach an Advanced Minimally Invasive Procedure

2012· article· en· W2036488918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCurriculumPsychomotor learningMedical physicsTest (biology)Educational measurementPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialMedical educationSurgeryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objective: To develop and validate a comprehensive ex vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Background: Simulators have been shown to be viable systems for teaching technical skills outside the operating room; however, integration of simulation training into comprehensive curricula remains a major challenge in modern surgical education. Currently, no curricula have been described or validated for advanced laparoscopic procedures. Methods: This prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial allocated 25 surgical residents to receive either conventional residency training or a comprehensive training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The curriculum consisted of proficiency-based psychomotor training on a virtual reality simulator, cognitive training, and participation in a cadaver lab. The primary outcome measure in this study was surgical performance in the operating room. All participants performed a laparoscopic right colectomy, which was video recorded and assessed using 2 previously validated assessment tools. Secondary outcome measures were knowledge relating to the execution of the procedure, assessed with a multiple-choice test, and technical performance on the simulator. Results: Curricular-trained residents demonstrated superior performance in the operating room compared with conventionally trained residents (global score 16.0 [14.5–18.0] versus 8.0 [6.0–14.5], P = 0.030; number of operative steps performed 16.0 [12.5–17.5] versus 8.0 [6.0–14.5], P = 0.021; procedure-specific score 71.1 [54.4–81.6] versus 51.1 [36.7–74.4], P = 0.122). Curricular-trained residents scored higher on the multiple-choice test (10 [9–11] versus 7.5 [5.3–7.5], P = 0.047), and outperformed conventionally trained residents in 7 of 8 tasks on the simulator. Conclusions: Participation in a comprehensive ex vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in improved technical knowledge and improved performance in the operating room compared with conventional residency training. Reg. ID#NCT 01371136. Currently, no ex vivo comprehensive curricula have been described or validated for advanced laparoscopic procedures. This randomized controlled trial describes a comprehensive ex vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical residents who train using this curriculum demonstrate superior performance in the operating room compared with conventionally trained residents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it