How Substrate Solvation Contributes to the Enantioselectivity of Subtilisin toward Secondary Alcohols
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current rule to predict the enantiopreference of subtilisin toward secondary alcohols is based on the size of the substituents at the stereocenter and implies that the active site contains two differently sized pockets for these substituents. Several experiments are inconsistent with the current rule. First, the X-ray structures of subtilisin show there is only one pocket (the S1' pocket) approximately the size of a phenyl group to bind secondary alcohols. Second, the rule often predicts the incorrect enantiomer for reactions in water. To resolve these contradictions, we refine the current rule to show that subtilisin binds only one substituent of a secondary alcohol and leaves the other in solvent. To test this refined empirical rule, we show that the enantioselectivity of a series of secondary alcohols in water varied linearly with the difference in hydrophobicity (log P/P0) of the substituents. This hydrophobicity difference accounts for the solvation of one substituent in water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".