MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036551847 · doi:10.3917/tgs.008.0123

Les femmes ouvrières en Russie : confusion des genres et précarité

2002· article· fr· W2036551847 on OpenAlexaff
Karine Clément

Bibliographic record

VenueTravail genre et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les femmes ouvrières de Russie voient leur situation profondément détériorée par les transformations sociales de marché. Celles-ci aggravent la division sexuée du travail et les discriminations dont elles sont l’objet. Surtout, elles soumettent la majorité des ouvriers à une grande instabilité, ce qui les oblige à développer des pratiques de "débrouille" de toutes sortes. Les hommes ouvriers se chargent surtout de la "débrouille" dans le monde professionnel, alors que les femmes assument la charge physique et surtout nerveuse de la gestion de la sphère domestique. Discriminations et division sexuée du travail sont liées aux représentations sociales qui mettent en avant la femme-mère et la femme féminine. Dans les faits, la femme ouvrière est cependant avant tout une travailleuse du précaire usant sa vie à la gagner. Par ce trait principal, sa vie se distingue peu de celle des hommes ouvriers. Pour prendre toute la mesure de la condition des femmes ouvrières, la problématique du genre doit donc être articulée à celle de déconstruction du groupe ouvrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTravail genre et sociétésSame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207