A Reinterpretation of the Magnetic Properties of the Mixed-Valence (Nb<sup>V</sup>/Nb<sup>IV</sup>) Zintl Phase, Cs<sub>9</sub>Nb<sub>2</sub>As<sub>6</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new mixed-valent (Nb(V)/Nb(IV)) Zintl phase, Cs(9)Nb(2)As(6), has been prepared and characterized, recently (Gascoin, F.; Sevov, S. C. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 5920). Niobium is present in the form of isolated, edge-sharing tetrahedral, Nb(2)As(6)(9)(-) dimers. The reported magnetic susceptibility features a broad maximum at approximately 36 K which has been interpreted as the onset of long-range antiferromagnetic order. Such a high transition temperature is difficult to understand as the compound is insulating and the interdimer Nb-Nb distance is 7.2 A. It is shown here that the observed magnetic properties follow straightforwardly from a statistical occupation of the equivalent intradimer Nb sites by equal concentrations of Nb(IV)(4d(1), S = (1)/(2)) and Nb(V)(4d(0)). From this analysis the broad maximum arises from intradimer antiferromagnetic exchange with an exchange constant, J/k = -40 K, and there is no long-range magnetic order except, possibly, below 5 K.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".