« Small is not beautiful » : la fragmentation politique de la Caraïbe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La géographie politique de la Caraïbe ne correspond plus à celle des années soixante. L'insularité, les cultures différentes, le colonialisme et la balkanisation en 23 territoires politiques ont fragmenté le monde antillais. La faillite d'une solution fédérale dans les Antilles Britanniques a été le principal ferment de cette pulvérisation territoriale. Débordant sur le domaine maritime, la partition politique du monde antillais engendre une régionalisation de la Mer Caraïbe par l'instauration de la zone économique de 200 milles. Actuellement, les Antilles françaises, américaines et néerlandaises apparaissent comme des systèmes territoriaux intégrés en sursis. Englobant les jeunes États successeurs des Antilles Britanniques, le marché commun Caricom n'atteint pas les objectifs escomptés. Finalement, en l'absence d'une antillanité intégratrice, la Caraïbe a été et ne demeure pas autre chose qu'une expression géographique. Elle constitue une vivante antithèse du principe « small is beautiful ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".