Médias et défense du patrimoine urbain francophone en milieu minoritaire au Manitoba : le cas du « 500 Taché » dans La Liberté
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’inscrit dans une perspective sociologique. Il vise à montrer comment les médias francophones manitobains participent aux discours sur la défense du patrimoine de la communauté franco-manitobaine. Les concepts d’identité et de patrimonialisation nous serviront à comprendre l’émergence d’un discours plus militant en faveur de la protection du patrimoine faisant référence à l’histoire de la culture francophone dans l’Ouest canadien. Nous nous interrogerons plus particulièrement sur la façon dont ce discours est relayé par le journal La Liberté en prenant l’exemple de la controverse du « 500 Taché ». Le but est de mesurer le rôle des médias dans leur façon de mobiliser les ressources nécessaires à la mise en valeur de la communauté qu’ils desservent. Cela conduira à distinguer la spécificité des médias francophones en milieu minoritaire qui, selon nous, consiste autant à informer qu’à cultiver le sentiment d’appartenance à une collectivité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".