Postsynaptic Receptive Field Size and Spike Threshold Determine Encoding of High-Frequency Information Via Sensitivity to Synchronous Presynaptic Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parallel sensory streams carrying distinct information about various stimulus properties have been observed in several sensory systems, including the visual system. What remains unclear is why some of these streams differ in the size of their receptive fields (RFs). In the electrosensory system, neurons with large RFs have short-latency responses and are tuned to high-frequency inputs. Conversely, neurons with small RFs are low-frequency tuned and exhibit longer-latency responses. What principle underlies this organization? We show experimentally that synchronous electroreceptor afferent (P-unit) spike trains selectively encode high-frequency stimulus information from broadband signals. This finding relies on a comparison of stimulus-spike output coherence using output trains obtained by either summing pairs of recorded afferent spike trains or selecting synchronous spike trains based on coincidence within a small time window. We propose a physiologically realistic decoding mechanism, based on postsynaptic RF size and postsynaptic output rate normalization that tunes target pyramidal cells in different electrosensory maps to low- or high-frequency signal components. By driving realistic neuron models with experimentally obtained P-unit spike trains, we show that a small RF is matched with a postsynaptic integration regime leading to responses over a broad range of frequencies, and a large RF with a fluctuation-driven regime that requires synchronous presynaptic input and therefore selectively encodes higher frequencies, confirming recent experimental data. Thus our work reveals that the frequency content of a broadband stimulus extracted by pyramidal cells, from P-unit afferents, depends on the amount of feedforward convergence they receive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".