MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036629534 · doi:10.1071/eg14076

Benefits of using multi-component transmitter–receiver systems for determining geometrical parameters of a dipole conductor from single-line anomalies

2015· article· en· W2036629534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueExploration Geophysics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNational Science Council
KeywordsTransmitterConductorTraverseOffset (computer science)PerpendicularDipoleElectrical conductorPhysicsGeometryAcousticsOpticsLine (geometry)Computer scienceTelecommunicationsGeologyMathematicsGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show the advantages of using multi-component transmitter–receiver systems for determining the geometry of a compact planar target whose electromagnetic response can be approximated by a dipole. Our approach is based on a modified version of an algorithm that we previously published using a single-component (vertical) transmitter.Tests on synthetic models reveal that single transmitter systems are unable to resolve the orientation of a dipole conductor that approaches axial symmetry with respect to the traverse line. This occurs as a result of lack of a noticeable y-component anomaly, where the y-component is oriented transverse to the flight-line direction. For a plate-like conductor, axial symmetry equates to being at a small offset and having a strike parallel or perpendicular to the traverse line. Here, the term ‘offset’ is used to denote the lateral distance from the centre of the conductor to the flight line. The ambiguities can be resolved through measuring specific components of a multi-component transmitter–receiver system; namely, Rxz and Rzz with one of Rxy, Ryy, Rzy, Ryx and Ryz, where the first letter denotes the orientation of the transmitter and the second letter denotes the orientation of the receiver. However, for the case of a MEGATEM system geometry, measuring Rzx, Rzz and Ryx is most suitable for determining the geometry of conductors striking nearly perpendicular or parallel, and at small offset to the traverse line. The minimum system capable of determining the correct geometrical parameters of a dipole conductor for the small-offset symmetric case would therefore consist of a two-component (y- and z-directed) transmitter, as well as a two component (x- and z-directed) receiver.Tests on line 15701 of the MEGATEM survey in Chibougamau, Quebec, confirm the inability of single-transmitter systems to determine geometrical parameters of a dipole conductor for the case where y-component data is unavailable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it