MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036638822 · doi:10.1159/000113686

Impact of Intracellular β-Amyloid in Transgenic Animals and Cell Models

2008· review· en· W2036638822 on OpenAlexaff
A. Claudio Cuello, Fabio Canneva

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurodegenerative Diseases · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntracellularExtracellularLong-term potentiationTransgeneAmyloid (mycology)Genetically modified mouseCell biologyBiologyNeuroscienceGene expressionGeneBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present commentary based on cell and animal models of intracellular beta-amyloid (iAbeta) expression indicates that low levels of microscopically undetectable iAbeta could have a physiological role in the modulation of the cyclic AMP response element (CRE)-dependent gene expression and, as a consequence, a positive influence on synaptic plasticity (the 'good' Abeta?). On the other hand, high levels of iAbeta resembling the pathological and microscopically visible accumulation of this amyloid peptide, akin to that observed in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease, disrupt CRE-regulated gene expression, therefore compromising the protein synthesis-dependent component of long-term potentiation (the 'bad' Abeta?). Moreover, intracellular pathology would be independent and additive to the toxic effects of the extracellular Abeta burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurodegenerative DiseasesSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207