MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036638822 · doi:10.1159/000113686

Impact of Intracellular β-Amyloid in Transgenic Animals and Cell Models

2008· review· en· W2036638822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurodegenerative Diseases · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntracellularExtracellularLong-term potentiationTransgeneAmyloid (mycology)Genetically modified mouseCell biologyBiologyNeuroscienceGene expressionGeneBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present commentary based on cell and animal models of intracellular beta-amyloid (iAbeta) expression indicates that low levels of microscopically undetectable iAbeta could have a physiological role in the modulation of the cyclic AMP response element (CRE)-dependent gene expression and, as a consequence, a positive influence on synaptic plasticity (the 'good' Abeta?). On the other hand, high levels of iAbeta resembling the pathological and microscopically visible accumulation of this amyloid peptide, akin to that observed in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease, disrupt CRE-regulated gene expression, therefore compromising the protein synthesis-dependent component of long-term potentiation (the 'bad' Abeta?). Moreover, intracellular pathology would be independent and additive to the toxic effects of the extracellular Abeta burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it