MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases in Inunimity: Lessons from Knockout Mice

2002· review· en· W2036649742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Biochemistry · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsAmgen (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinaseKnockout mouseCell biologyPhosphorylationInositolPhosphoinositide 3-kinaseBiologyPiSignal transductionLipid signalingPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGene knockoutGeneGeneticsBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) constitute a family of evolutionarily conserved lipid kinases that phosphorylate the D3 position of the inositol ring of phosphoinositides and produce PI(3)P, PI(3,4)P(2), and PI(3,4,5)P(3). Intense in vitro research over the last decade has unequivocally demonstrated that PI3Ks, in particular those belonging to class I, regulate a vast array of fundamental cellular responses. Given the pleiotropic roles of PI3Ks and the lipid product PI(3,4,5)P(3) in plethora of cellular responses, it is pertinent to explore the significance of PI3K signaling in vivo. In the past two or three years, the components of this signaling pathway have been genetically manipulated in mouse. This review briefly summarizes the immunological significance of PI3K signaling as revealed by the study of gene-targeted "knockout" mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it