MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036663912 · doi:10.1021/ma000160v

Small-Angle Neutron Scattering of Blends of Arborescent Polystyrenes

2000· article· en· W2036663912 on OpenAlexaff
Sangwook Choi, Robert M. Briber, Barry J. Bauer, Dawei Liu, Mario Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyrenePolymerNeutron scatteringDeuteriumSmall-angle scatteringMaterials scienceMoleculePhase (matter)Phase diagramSmall-angle neutron scatteringScatteringPolymer blendPolymer chemistryChemistryPhysicsCopolymerOpticsOrganic chemistryComposite materialAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) was used to measure the size and shape of styrene-based arborescent polymers blended with linear deuterated polystyrene (d-PS) and linear deuterated poly(vinyl methyl ether) (d-PVME). For generation 0, 1, and 2 arborescent polymers, the R g were essentially equivalent in going from d-PVME to d-PS as the matrix material while for generation 3 (G3) the R g in d-PS was found to be smaller than in d-PVME. For comparison, the R g of a sphere was calculated assuming the size of the sphere was equivalent to a G3 molecule collapsed to bulk density. The R g obtained was 162 Å, which is quite close to the R g of the G3 polymer in d-PS ( R g = 164 Å). This indicates that the G3 molecules should behave as essentially noninterpenetrating spheres with the linear d-PS matrix chains being largely excluded from the interior of the arborescent molecules. In the single phase region of the phase diagram it was difficult to establish a clear temperature dependence of the R g for the generation 0, 1, and 2 molecules in d-PVME. For the G3 molecules in d-PVME a small decrease in R g with increasing temperature was observed in the single phase region with an abrupt decrease of 21% on phase separation between 110 and 115 °C. The single particle form factor of arborescent polymers in blends was studied using a power law model for the density profile. In comparison with a hard sphere or a shell model, the scattering function calculated from the power law function for the density profile provided the best fit to the experimental scattering data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207