MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036679198 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2014.7094542

Detecting convoys in networks of short-ranged sensors

2014· article· en· W2036679198 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Lawlor, Michael Rabbat

Bibliographic record

Venue2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLicenseMarkov chainMarkov processConstruct (python library)Hidden Markov modelProperty (philosophy)Process (computing)False positive paradoxSeries (stratigraphy)Data miningArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingMachine learningComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detecting groups of vehicles travelling together as a convoy is an important problem in military and law enforcement applications. License plate recognition sensors provide discrete, irregularly sampled, time series information about where vehicles are travelling. With this irregular time series, we would like to determine when vehicles travel as a convoy. We construct a semi-Markov process to model network traffic and utilize the Markov property to develop a sequential hypothesis test. This requires defining two models for how vehicles travel through the network and testing the likelihood between them. The main contribution of this work is the modeling of the alternate hypothesis of when two vehicles are traveling as a convoy. We present performance results based on simulated data showing the tradeoff between false-positives and true detections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and ComputersSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207