MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036703606 · doi:10.1016/s0248-4900(00)01100-x

Differentiation of mucous neck cells into parietal cells: a new concept of mitochondrial biogenesis

2000· article· en· W2036703606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Cell · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMitochondrionGolgi apparatusCell biologyOrganelleParietal cellEndoplasmic reticulumGastric chief cellMitosisGastric mucosaBiochemistryStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parietal cells of the gastric fundic mucosa are small and contain only a few tiny mitochondria when they begin to differentiate from mucous neck cells. The canalicular ATPase activity characteristic of mature parietal cells is discrete in these young cells, whereas areas of very high activity are apparent in the Golgi complex, reticulum, nuclear envelope, mitochondrial wall, and plasma membrane. Close relations and contacts occur between mitochondria and these organelles, and the size and number of mitochondria increase progressively. These relations, as well as mitochondrial ATPase activity (a true differentiation marker), cease once the mitochondria become as numerous and large as those of a mature parietal cell. Our observations suggest that a secondary form of mitochondrial biogenesis, involving the massive participation of other organelles and independent of the classical mechanisms inherent in mitosis, occurs in parietal cells at the beginning of G1 phase during the 6 days of their maturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it