Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis in Psoriatic Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to identify the features associated with its occurrence. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the University of Toronto PsA observational cohort initiated in 1978. All patients fulfilled the CASPAR criteria. Radiographs of peripheral joints and spine were obtained every 2 years. DISH was defined as flowing bony bridges in at least 4 contiguous thoracic vertebrae. Each PsA patient with DISH was matched by sex to 3 PsA patients without DISH. Demographics, disease characteristics, and radiographic features were compared using McNemar test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and paired t test as appropriate. Logistic regression analyses models with stepwise regression were conducted. RESULTS: DISH was observed in 78 (8.3%) of 938 patients with PsA. Patients with DISH were older and had longer disease duration, higher body mass index (BMI), and higher uric acid levels. Diabetes and hypertension were more prevalent in patients with DISH than in those without. The severity of radiographic damage to peripheral joints was also greater in patients with DISH. The presence of inflammatory back pain, HLA-B*27 allele, and sacroiliitis was similar in both groups. Patients with DISH had more syndesmophytes and calcaneal spurs. Older age, higher BMI, and the presence of radiographic damage to peripheral joints were associated with DISH in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of DISH is possible in the presence of axial PsA. DISH was associated with known DISH-related factors including older age and high BMI, as well as the presence of radiographic damage to peripheral joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".