MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036761220 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2012-72103

Optimization of the Inlet Velocity Profile in a Conical Diffuser

2012· article· en· W2036761220 on OpenAlexafffund
Sergio Galván, Marcelo Reggio, François Guibault

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsInletDraft tubeDiffuser (optics)Conical surfaceTurbineMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Computational fluid dynamicsMarine engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past numerical and experimental research has shown that the draft tube inlet velocity has a critical importance in the hydropower plants performance. However, there is a lack of information in terms of flow parameters and in particular of swirl distribution. With regards to the overall performance of a turbine, the optimization of the inlet velocity profile constitutes a new approach to control the inlet flow conditions to yield better draft tube and turbine performance. Numerical optimization methods have been successfully used for a variety of design problems. However, the optimization of boundary conditions in hydraulic turbines is a new challenge. Thus a detailed research of the optimization methodology is the aim of this paper. Three different vortex equations to represent the inlet velocity profile are applied to a cone diffuser and the behavior of the objective function is analyzed. A discussion concerning the development of a flow structure caused by the inlet swirl parameters is included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207