Solution Structure and Dynamics of Oxytetracycline Polyketide Synthase Acyl Carrier Protein from <i>Streptomyces rimosus</i><sup>,</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type II polyketide synthases (PKSs) utilize a dedicated and essential acyl carrier protein (ACP) in the biosynthesis of a specific polyketide product. As part of our ongoing studies into the mechanisms and control of polyketide biosynthesis, we report the second structure of a polyketide synthase ACP. In this work, multidimensional, heteronuclear NMR was employed to investigate the structure and dynamics of the ACP involved in the biosynthesis of the commonly prescribed polyketide antibiotic, oxytetracycline (otc). An ensemble of 28 structures of the 95 amino acid otc ACP (9916Da) was computed by simulated annealing with the inclusion of 1132 experimental restraints. Atomic RMSDs about the mean structure for all 28 models is 0.66 A for backbone atoms, 1.15 A for all heavy atoms (both values calculated for the folded part of the protein (residues 3-80)), and 0.41 A for backbone atoms within secondary structure. Otc ACP adopts the typical right-handed, four-helix fold of currently known ACPs but with the addition of a 13-residue flexible C-terminus. A comparison of the global folds of all structurally characterized ACPs is described, illustrating that PKS ACPs show clear differences as well as similarities to FAS ACPs. (15)N relaxation experiments for the protein backbone also reveal that the long loop between helices I and II is flexible and helix II, a proposed site of protein-protein interactions, shows conformational exchange. The helices of the ACP form a rigid scaffold for the protein, but these are interspersed with an unusual proportion of flexible linker regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".