MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036785419 · doi:10.1287/moor.28.1.154.14259

A Generalized Stochastic Differential Utility

2003· article· en· W2036785419 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelastic utilityStochastic differential equationMathematicsRisk aversion (psychology)Expected utility hypothesisMathematical economicsMathematical optimizationQuadratic variationMonotonic functionGeneralizationPortfolioEconometricsBrownian motionApplied mathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper generalizes, in the setting of Brownian information, the Duffie–Epstein (1992) stochastic differential formulation of intertemporal recursive utility (SDU). We provide a utility functional of state-contingent consumption plans that exhibits a local dependency with respect to the utility intensity process (the integrand of the quadratic variation) and call it the generalized SDU. This mathematical generalization of the SDU permits, in fact, more flexibility in the separation between risk aversion and intertemporal substitution and allows to model asymmetry in risk aversion. We extensively use the backward stochastic differential equation theory to give sufficient conditions for comparative and absolute risk aversion behavior as well as aversion to specific directional risk. Additionally, we discuss whether our functional exhibits monotonicity to its information filtration argument. For purposes of illustration, we provide some applications to the consumption/portfolio strategy selection problem in a complete securities market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it