MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036829516 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/1/2

IONIZED NITROGEN AT HIGH REDSHIFT

2012· article· en· W2036829516 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Decarli, Fabian Walter, R. Neri, F. Bertoldi, C. L. Carilli, P. Cox, Jean‐Paul Kneib, J.-F. Lestrade, R. Maiolino, A. Omont, Johan Richard, Dominik A. Riechers, Karun Thanjavur, A. Weiß

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRedshiftPlateau de Bure InterferometerAstrophysicsGalaxyInterstellar mediumIonizationStar formationAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present secure [N ii ] 205 μm detections in two millimeter-bright, strongly lensed objects at high redshift, APM 08279+5255 ( z = 3.911) and MM 18423+5938 ( z = 3.930), using the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer. Due to its ionization energy [N ii ] 205 μm is a good tracer of the ionized gas phase in the interstellar medium. The measured fluxes are S ([N ii ] 205 μm ) = (4.8 ± 0.8) Jy km s −1 and (7.4 ± 0.5) Jy km s −1 , respectively, yielding line luminosities of L ([N ii ] 205 μm ) = (1.8 ± 0.3) × 10 9 μ −1 L ☉ for APM 08279+5255 and L ([N ii ] 205 μm ) = (2.8 ± 0.2) × 10 9 μ −1 L ☉ for MM 18423+5938. Our high-resolution map of the [N ii ] 205 μm and 1 mm continuum emission in MM 18423+5938 clearly resolves an Einstein ring in this source and reveals a velocity gradient in the dynamics of the ionized gas. A comparison of these maps with high-resolution EVLA CO observations enables us to perform the first spatially resolved study of the dust continuum-to-molecular gas surface brightness (Σ FIR ∝Σ N CO , which can be interpreted as the star formation law) in a high-redshift object. We find a steep relation ( N = 1.4 ± 0.2), consistent with a starbursting environment. We measure a [N ii ] 205 μm /FIR luminosity ratio in APM 08279+5255 and MM 18423+5938 of 9.0 × 10 −6 and 5.8 × 10 −6 , respectively. This is in agreement with the decrease of the [N ii ] 205 μm /FIR ratio at high FIR luminosities observed in local galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207