Structural phase transition and dielectric relaxation in Pb(Zn<sub>1/3</sub>Nb<sub>2/3</sub>)O<sub>3</sub>single crystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure and the dielectric properties of Pb (Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 (PZN) crystal have been investigated by means of high-resolution synchrotron x-ray diffraction (with an x-ray energy of 32 keV) and dielectric spectroscopy (in the frequency range 100 Hz–1 MHz). At high temperatures, the PZN crystal exhibits a cubic symmetry and polar nanoregions inherent to relaxor ferroelectrics are present, as evidenced by the single (222) Bragg peak and by the noticeable tails at the base of the peak. At low temperatures, in addition to the well-known rhombohedral phase, another low-symmetry, probably monoclinic, phase is found. The two phases coexist in the form of mesoscopic domains. The ferroelectric phase transition is diffuse and observed between 325 and 390 K, where the concentration of the low-temperature phases gradually increases and the cubic phase disappears upon cooling. However, no dielectric anomalies can be detected in the temperature range of the diffuse phase transition. The temperature dependence of the dielectric constant shows a maximum at higher temperature ( T m = 417–429 K, depending on frequency) with the typical relaxor dispersion at T < T m and the frequency dependence of T m fitted to the Vogel–Fulcher relation. Application of an electric field upon cooling from the cubic phase or poling the crystal in the ferroelectric phase gives rise to a sharp anomaly of the dielectric constant at K and greatly diminishes the dispersion at lower temperatures, but the dielectric relaxation process around T m remains qualitatively unchanged. The results are discussed in the framework of the present models of relaxors and in comparison with the prototypical relaxor ferroelectric Pb (Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".