Perspectives on Peace Operations and Human Rights
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This publication was grant-aided by the Publications Fund of National University of Ireland, Galway. Notes 1. John Roper, Masashi Nishihara, Olara A.Otunnu and Enid Schoettle, Keeping the Peace in the Post-Cold War Era: Strengthening Multilateral Peacekeeping, New York: Trilateral Commission, 1993, p.4. 2. Pearson Peacekeeping Centre Canada (available at www.peaceoperations.org/en/peace_operations.asp). 3. Mats Berdal and Richard Caplan, ‘The Politics of International Administration’, Global Governance, 2004, Vol.10, No.1, p.2. 4. Human Rights Committee, ‘Comments on United States of America’, para.19, UN doc. CCPR/C/79/Add 50 (1995); John Cerone, ‘Reasonable measures in unreasonable circumstances: a legal responsibility framework for human rights violations in post-conflict territories under UN administration’, in Nigel D. White and Dirk Klaasen (eds), The UN, Human Rights and Post-conflict Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005, pp.42–80, at 46. 5. General Comment No.31, UN doc. CCPR/C/2/1/Rev.1/Add. 13 (2004) [10]. 6. ‘Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee’: Belgium 19 Nov. 1998, UN doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.99[14] and 12 Aug. 2004, UN doc. CCPR/C/81/BEL[10]. 7. See Common Core Document, UN doc. CCPR/C/UNK/1, 13 Mar. 2006; ‘Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee’, UN doc. CCPR/C/UNK/CO/1, 25 July 2006. 8. These include the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1953): the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (1986); the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1989); the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence Against Women (1995); the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture (1987); and the American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José, 1979). 9. Bankovic a.o. v. Belgium a.o, Appl. no. 52207/99, ECtHR, 12 Dec. 2001. The European Court of Human Rights held that the claims against NATO states for violation of human rights were inadmissible on the basis that the bombing occurred in territory outside the legal space of the European Convention. 10. Coard et al. v. the United States, Case 10.951, Report No. 109/99, 29 Sept. 1999. 11. Nigel D. White and Dirk Klaasen, ‘An Emerging Legal Regime’, in White and Klaasen (n.4 above), p.7; Boris Kondoch, ‘Human Rights Law and UN Peace Operations in Post-conflict Situations’ in White and Klaasen, p.36.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it