MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036866449 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821528ab

Fuming over Parkinson disease

2011· letter· en· W2036866449 on OpenAlexafffund
W. R. Wayne Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineParkinson's diseaseDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the challenges in developing a strategy for modifying the inexorable progression of neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson disease (PD) is to develop practical methods to detect pathologic changes prior to the onset of symptoms in appropriate individuals. Functional neuroimaging with PET may be helpful in this regard. Tracers such as 6-[18F]fluoro-l-dopa (FDOPA) or [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine bind to presynaptic dopaminergic nerve endings. Studies in PD with these compounds consistently demonstrate a characteristic rostrocaudal gradient of decreased striatal tracer uptake corresponding to the pattern of presynaptic dopaminergic nerve terminal dysfunction. This technique has been extended successfully to studies of asymptomatic individuals who are thought to be at risk for the development of PD. Subclinical dysfunction in the nigrostriatal dopamine system has been demonstrated in asymptomatic subjects exposed to MPTP1 and in subjects with a high genetic risk of PD.2 While the underlying etiology of the majority of cases of PD is unknown, there is evidence that exposure to manganese, even at relatively low levels, can result in a spectrum of neurologic …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207