MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Voluntary Drinking, Body Hydration and Aerobic Performance of Adolescent Male Athletes Running in the Heat

2008· article· en· W2036884932 on OpenAlexaff
Boguslaw Wilk, Brian W. Timmons

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid intakeAerobic exerciseTreadmillAnimal scienceAthletesThermoregulationTurnoverVO2 maxChemistryAcclimatizationMedicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineHeart rateBiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that beverage flavoring and carbohydrate (CHO) and NaCl stimulate voluntary fluid intake in non-athletic children cycling at a moderate intensity in the heat, thereby preventing dehydration. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of beverage flavoring and composition on voluntary fluid intake, body hydration, and aerobic performance in heat-acclimated adolescent male athletes running in the heat at a higher intensity and with much shorter rest periods, than in our previous studies. METHODS: Nine 12- to 15-year-old male cross-country runners (VO2max: 59.2±1.3 mL·kg−1·min−1) underwent at least 4 heat-acclimation sessions (80 min each), followed by three experimental sessions. All sessions were performed at 30°C, 60-65% relative humidity. Each experimental session comprised five 15-min treadmill runs at a speed eliciting 65% VO2max, interspersed by 5 min rest. Ten min after the last treadmill bout, an aerobic performance test (APT - running to exhaustion at a speed eliciting 90% VO2max) was completed. The experimental sessions were identical, except for the beverage that the subjects drank ad libitum: water (W), flavored water (FW), and FW with 6% CHO and 18 mmol·L−1 NaCl (CNa) assigned in a counterbalanced order. Drink intake and body weight (BW) were monitored periodically. RESULTS: Voluntary fluid intake was slightly higher than sweat loss in CNa (1223±111 vs. 1098±91 g), but slightly lower in W (973±129 vs. 1106±89 g) and FW (1063±79 vs. 1113±88 g). Although lower than total fluid losses through sweating, respiration and urine output, voluntary fluid intake during intermittent running was sufficient to prevent major dehydration by the start of the APT (−0.2±0.2 %BW in CNa, and −0.5±0.2 %BW in W and FW). The APT was statistically not different among experimental trials (W: 8.24±0.71 min, FW: 7.45±0.16 min, and CNa: 9.09±0.9 min). CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous findings in non-athletic, unacclimatized boys cycling at a moderate intensity (50% VO2max), heat-acclimated adolescent runners voluntarily consumed enough fluid (irrespective of flavoring and content) to remain well hydrated while running at 65% VO2max in the heat. This likely resulted in similar aerobic performance observed in the W, FW and CNa trials. Supported by Gatorade Sports Science Institute

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207