MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036891504 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v4n4p152

The Need for Science and Technology Driving Forces in Sustainable Socio-economic Development of Nigeria

2011· article· en· W2036891504 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olukayode O Adebile, D. K. Shangodoyin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Education and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureSustainable developmentUnemploymentBusinessInvestment (military)Capital (architecture)EconomicsEconomic growthScale (ratio)Natural resource economicsEconomic policyEconomic systemPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the problems confronting Nigeria as a nation and the contributions of science and technology to the economy. We observe that effective science and technology policies are crucial in advancing Nigeria economically, socially and politically given the varieties of challenges facing the largest populated nation in Africa. Alternate sources of energy to alleviate the inadequacy of electricity supply in Nigeria are suggested base on availability of needed local resources. Unemployment should be reduced through provision of soft credit loans to small scale investments and informal sectors of the economy. There should be an appreciable investment in the non-oil and agricultural sector to boost the economy. The commitment to sustainable monetary and fiscal policies and human capital development are identified as key driving factors of the Nigerian economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicAfrican Education and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207